Into the Wild Free Essays

â€Å"Into the Wild† is a book written by John Krakauer about Chris McCandless and his journey to gain spiritual enlightenment. Krakauer introduces us to Everett Reuss and the Irish Monks who also go on journeys similar to McCandless’s to gain spiritual enlightenment. Chris McCandless is a young man who left everything he had ever known behind to find and gain spiritual enlightenment. We will write a custom essay sample on Into the Wild or any similar topic only for you Order Now Everett Reuss is a man who went into the wild to hike a mountain. His death is still undetermined and his body has never been found. The Irish Monks go into the wild the get even farther away from society and search for spiritual enlightenment. â€Å"Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgment that something else is more important than fear. † I feel Chris, Everett, and the monks were very courageous and has few fears as they began and ultimately ended their journeys to gain spiritual enlightenment. Most people think to gain spiritual enlightenment all you have to do is pray, read your bible, and go to church, but Chris, Everett, and the monks took it to the extreme of leaving civilization and going into the wild where they sadly died. Chris McCandless, Everett Reuss, and the Irish Monks are very admirable men. To walk away from everything they have ever known to find spiritual enlightenment seems insane. I admire McCandless, Reuss, and the Monks, but I do not understand what would compel these men to go to such extremes as to gain spiritual enlightenment. In my opinion these men could have found the same amount of spiritual enlightenment by going to a church or reading the bible. Every summer, my church and myself take two weeks out of our hectic lives to help with the local food pantry in Stuttgart. Our cell phones are left in the car while we work so there is no distraction as to the reason we are actually there. Seeing people leave with sack after sack of food and knowing they will no longer be hungry or worrying where their next meal will come from brings me spiritual enlightenment. Chris, Everett, and all others mentioned through the book have given up much to go on their journeys. I think that yes, their adventures were worth it. All of the people had the choice to stay in society, but they believe this journey would bring them closer to spiritual enlightenment. I believe all he people had a reason for each adventure chosen though to us they are unknown. If their was any way we could ask Chris, Everett, or the monks if they believe their adventures were worth it I believe they would say yes, in the beginning of the journey it was, but as everything progressed throughout the book, no. Chris began to feel that he needed companionship with society, but he was sadly too late. H ow Everett died is still unknown. There are two different theories. One is he jumped off the cliff he was climbing and the other is he fell to his death after making a wrong step. The monks died in the wild trying to gain spiritual enlightenment. If I were asked to try a wilderness retreat such as Chris did I think I would laugh in the person’s face. There is no way that I would leave everything I know. I may not be as spiritually enlightened as some individuals, but I do not feel the need to go into the wild or to such extremes to find it. There are many dangers with being in the wild alone and not to mention the solitude. I could not willingly decide to just pack up and go not knowing if I’d ever return to civilization again. I believe you do not have to go into the wild to find spiritual enlightenment. God is always with you no matter where you are or may go. You do not have to go to such extremes as death to try and get the attention of God or to find the spiritual enlightenment they strived so hard to find. I know these men believed they needed to go into the wild to find spiritual enlightenment, but how could they not know that God, or the spiritual enlightenment they lost their lives for was already with them? How to cite Into the Wild, Papers Into the Wild Free Essays Novelist Jon Krakauer, in his novel, â€Å"Into the Wild,† examines Chris McCandless’s life from all perspectives. Krakauer’s purpose is to explore Chris in terms of his own reasoning. He adopts a serious tone in order to convey the characters actions to the readers. We will write a custom essay sample on Into the Wild or any similar topic only for you Order Now Krakauer begins his novel by observing the aspects of Chris’s adventure. He appeals to the negative emotions of the audience by explaining everything Chris did before he left on his journey. He adds that Chris â€Å"burned all the cash in his wallet,† in order to define the life Chris was living (Krakauer 1). This sense of negative emotions from Krakauer conveys a striking tone that informs the readers that going into the wild means sacrificing what you have. The author, Jon Krakauer, then move forward and juxtaposes Chris McCandless and Leo Tolstoy. â€Å"Chris admired the novelist and was long captivated by his writing† (Krakauer 2). These were juxtaposed to bring two meanings together as one. Krakauer moves to the next part of his novel by clarifying Chris’s authority. He appeals to authority when examining Chris’s conversation with Mr. Franz. â€Å"Look, Mr. Franz, you don’t need to worry about me† (Krakauer 51). This illustrates that McCandless was a very independent person. He wanted to do everything on his own. he was â€Å"living like this by choice† (51). Krakauer ends his book by discussing the positive effects of Chris McCandless’s personality. He appeals to the distinct emotions presented to the readers by acknowledging the encounters he had on the people he met. The population he impacted â€Å"admired Chris for what he was trying to do† (Krakauer 203). Jon Krakauer develops a serious tone to convey the characters’ actions to the people who are reading the novel. Krakauer’s purpose was to explore Chris and to find out his reasoning for being out in the nature. Jon is not able to find a conclusion about Chris’s journey and why he sacrificed his life to be out in the nature because Chris is not alive. If Chris had not died, Krakauer would have his solution he had been looking for How to cite Into the Wild, Papers Into the Wild Free Essays Into the wild Free Essays Into the wild 4 Chris Mishandles, a Sophisticated Young Man. Even though Chris wanted to get absolute freedom, his Journey turned out to be a just selfish one, not even getting totally separated from the civilization or society. It Is possible that he went out on a Journey to get everlasting freedom from strict rules and formats. We will write a custom essay sample on Into the wild or any similar topic only for you Order Now Even If Chris was an intellectual student, getting all As, well enough to go to Harvard law school, one time, he got F on a Physics. The reason was that Chris id not follow the format that the teacher told to students, regardless of the answers. His father agrees with the teacher, which shows his father, as well as the teacher, was a very strict person, especially on rules. As he realized that his father had another wife, and thought of his father as a immoral man, this young man who was full of energy may wanted to get out the society and get free. As he got out of the society, he earns money by himself and travels by himself. The one contradiction that I found was that he needed the money. Nowadays, money Is necessary for trade, economy; It became the basic part of our lives. In this sense, money can represent the excelled world, which Chris was not able to get rid of. If he did not need the money, there Is no reason for him to work In a Macdonald or under Westerners. Chris even mentions In one of his letters that he realized the money was necessary part of his journey, which seems contradictory for pure freedom. Another contradiction could be found with his life in Alaska. The reason why he went there was because he as motivated by his books. One of them is â€Å"Call of the Wild†, by Jack London. The story of this book is about a dog from California, going back to Alaska undergoing lots of sufferings. It seems that the dog got absolute freedom, but the author himself never went to Alaska, not even into the wilds. Chris also thought that Alaska was a pure nature. He thought that this purity and isolation would enable him to find out who he truly is, by feeling the nature and working by himself. Well, reality was different. Chris lacked In food. If he had enough time for this kind of self-learning, his diary would not be full of foods, rather what he observed on that day or what he realized should be written. Furthermore, even If he tried to get out of the world full of structures, his journey and its consequence (his deathly shows that this was for his own good. A death of one’s child is one of the most tragic occurrences for parents. Chris not coming back home, and death made his parents worry such that his mother ,Bible, would mistakenly think any hitchhiker passing by as her son. Chris Mishandles is truly a sophisticated young man, with desire for freedom, who had to rely on money, trying to find out who he truly was, being a selfish one at the end. Just selfish one, not even getting totally separated from the civilization or society. It is and formats. Even if Chris was an intellectual student, getting all As, well enough to I found was that he needed the money. Nowadays, money is necessary for trade, economy; it became the basic part of our lives. In this sense, money can represent the civilized world, which Chris was not able to get rid of. If he did not need the money, there is no reason for him to work in a Macdonald or under Westerners. Chris even mentions in one of his letters that he realized the money was necessary part of his Journey, which seems contradictory for pure freedom. Another contradiction different. Chris lacked in food. If he had enough time for this kind of self-learning, his realized should be written. Furthermore, even if he tried to get out of the world full of structures, his Journey and its consequence. How to cite Into the wild, Papers Into the Wild Free Essays Into the Wild Essay In the world of journalism, there is a code of ethics known as journalistic integrity, which when followed, ensures that the work done by journalists meets certain standards. Journalistic integrity includes fair, unbiased material with truth and accuracy. This is a tough job, and journalists sometimes let their own experiences and opinions interfere with journalistic integrity. We will write a custom essay sample on Into the Wild or any similar topic only for you Order Now A very obvious example of this is Jon Krakauer’s account of the odyssey of Chris McCandless: Into the Wild. He shows a lack of objectivity, along with a lack of impartiality, based off of his obsession with the American Spirit. It is very easy to notice this lack of objectivity and impartiality throughout the book. Throughout Into the Wild, Krakauer uses examples of the â€Å"American Spirit,† and applies it to both his life and Chris McCandless’s. When he was writing the book, Krakauer felt a connection to Chris because of their similarities, including the American Spirit. This connection brought a lot of criticism to Krakauer, because it made it hard for him to say anything negative about Chris. There are several examples of Krakauer’s American Spirit, which was overall shown through his thrill for adventure. Krakauer shows that in his youth he â€Å"†¦ devoted most of my waking hours to fantasizing about, and then undertaking, ascents of remote mountains in Alaska† (Krakauer 134). What he means here is that he always had a hunger for climbing. He also shows off his thrill for adventure here: â€Å"How would it feel, I wondered, to be balanced on that bladelike summit ridge, worrying over the storm clouds building in the distance† (Krakauer 133). This quote really stands out, as he is attracted to what most people fear. Like many people, he â€Å"†¦was stirred by the dark mystery of mortality† (Krakauer 155). In other words, he was interested in and embraced the fact that at some point his life would end, and he had no idea when. Krakauer’s parents had a different version of the American Spirit. Krakauer states that he and his siblings â€Å"†¦were hectored to excel in every class, to win medals in science fairs, to be chosen princess of the prom, to win election to student government† (Krakauer 148). As you can see here, his parents had very different ideas for Krakauer’s life than he did. Throughout the book, Krakauer seems to glorify most of McCandless’s actions, even a lot of the illogical ones. He is so impartial because in lot of ways he sees himself in Chris, so he only wanted to focus on the smart and brave things that he did. You can tell that Krakauer sees himself in McCandless from the way he compares himself to him; at one point he states that â€Å"†¦Like McCandless, figures of male authority aroused in me a confusing medley of corked fury and hunger to please† (Krakauer 134). This shows that he hated society, yet he still cared about what people thought about him. When it comes to objectivity, Krakauer does not do a very good job; at many points he puts himself into the story, such as here: â€Å"As a youth, I am told, I was willful, intermittently reckless, moody† (Krakauer 134). In this quote, he is also comparing himself to McCandless; this is furthermore showing that he is bias. He even has chapters about himself going though his own personal experiences, which is a lack of objectivity. Also, whenever he does talk about McCandless, he often inserts his own opinions into the story. From his opinions, it makes it very obvious that Krakauer admires almost everything that McCandless did during his odyssey. While Krakauer is obviously a strong supporter of McCandless and his great adventure, he also tells it accurately. Even though he makes attempts to justify the extremely stupid and reckless things that McCandless did on his journey, Krakauer still does in fact mention all of, or at least most of, the stupid and reckless things that Chris did on his journey. He includes the opinions of many of McCandless’s critics, along with many of his supporters. Krakauer also includes many of McCandless’s journal entries throughout the book, with some very long, and others as short as â€Å"MOOSE! † (Krakauer 166). McCandless wrote this when he shot a moose, which he later recalled as one of the worst tragedies of his life, because the moose quickly spoiled. While Krakauer does in fact make his story accounting the life of Chris McCandless accurate, he also certainly fails to make it impartial and unbiased. He seems to justify all of Chris’s mistakes poorly conceived plans. The fact that Krakauer used this technique likely drove people away from the book; it is also likely that this pulled other people towards the book. Overall, this book is bias, yet it still has accurate and honest accounts. Throughout all of Into the Wild Krakauer seems to have no regards for the rules of journalistic integrity. As a result, the reader does not get a full, genuine portrayal of Chris McCandless’s journey; they instead see McCandless through the eyes of Krakauer, which is overall just a reflection of Krakauer himself. As a result of Krakauer’s lack of ability to leave himself out of the story, along with his personal opinions of McCandless, the biography completely lacks the integrity of journalism. Works Cited Krakauer, Jon. Into the Wild. New York: Anchor, 1997. Print. How to cite Into the Wild, Essay examples